• Procedure started
  • Under evaluation
  • CHMP opinion
  • European Commission final decision

Overview

Authorised uses of cancer medicine Yondelis unchanged following review of new data

On 23 July 2020, EMA recommended that the use of Yondelis (trabectedin) in treating ovarian cancer remain unchanged following a review of a study that investigated Yondelis as a third-line treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the study results will be included in the medicine’s product information to provide healthcare professionals with the most up-to-date information on the effects of Yondelis in patients with ovarian cancer.

An analysis of study OVC-3006 investigating the use of Yondelis plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, another cancer medicine) in patients with ovarian cancer was carried out while the study was still ongoing and showed that, overall, patients treated with Yondelis plus PLD did not live longer than patients given PLD alone. As a result, the study was terminated ahead of time.

EMA’s human medicines committee (CHMP) assessed the data and concluded that the results available are not robust enough to draw firm conclusions. Available evidence from the study does not put into question the benefits and risks of Yondelis in its currently authorised uses. Further, there are key differences between OVC-3006 and the study that supported the authorisation of Yondelis (OVA-301). The main difference is that patients in study OVC-3006 had a more advanced disease and had been more heavily treated than those included in OVA-301. In addition, a significant proportion of patients in study OVC-3006 had ovarian cancer that was resistant to medicines containing platinum, while Yondelis is currently authorised for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

When considering Yondelis’ safety, the CHMP noted that in the OVC-3006 study patients treated with Yondelis and PLD had more side effects and more severe ones than those treated with PLD only; however, the committee considered that a higher occurrence of side effects is not unexpected with combination treatments compared to treatments used alone.

The CHMP recommended that the results of the study be included in the summary of product characteristics of Yondelis so that healthcare professionals have the most up-to-date information when prescribing the medicine.

  • EMA had looked at results from a study with Yondelis in ovarian cancer because of concerns that the medicine could be less effective than previously thought.
  • EMA’s review found that results did not impact the authorised uses of the medicine. Yondelis can therefore continue to be as used as normal.
  • Yondelis is authorised for treating ovarian cancer that has relapsed (come back after previous treatment) and is sensitive to medicines containing platinum.
  • If you have any concerns or questions about your treatment, please talk to your doctor.

  • OVC-3006 was a phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Yondelis plus PLD compared with PLD alone in women with recurrent ovarian cancer after failure of two platinum-containing regimens. The study was discontinued because an unplanned interim analysis of the primary endpoint (overall survival) suggested that the study would not meet its primary objective and because the occurrence of side effects was higher in the Yondelis group.
  • There was no significant difference between the median overall survival in the Yondelis plus PLD arm (23.8 months) and the PLD arm (22.2 months) (HR=0.93, 95% Cl: 0.73-1.18; p=0.52) when the unscheduled futility analysis was performed at 45% of the planned events required for final analysis (232/514 deaths).
  • The CHMP concluded that these data do not change the benefit-risk balance of Yondelis in the currently authorised indications as there are a number of differences between OVC-3006 and the study that supported the authorisation of Yondelis (OVA-301).
  • Study OVA-301 included patients who had been previously treated for ovarian carcinoma (80% previously received taxanes) but had only one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and had experienced either recurrence or progression after the platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival.
  • The CHMP noted that patients in OVA-301 were in second-line treatment while those included in OVC-3006 were in third-line treatment. In addition, a post hoc analysis determined that 42% of enrolled patients in OVC-3006 were platinum-resistant following their last platinum-containing regimen while Yondelis is currently authorised for treatment of women with relapsed platinum- sensitive ovarian cancer.
  • The committee also noted that because the study was terminated early, the results do not provide sufficiently robust clinical evidence to call into question the results of the study OVA-301 which showed favourable effects of Yondelis plus PLD in terms of progression-free survival in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
  • With regard to safety, there was a considerable difference between the two treatment arms in OVC-3006 in terms of numbers and severity of adverse events. Approximately 85% of patients in the Yondelis plus PLD arm had severe adverse events compared with 64% in the control arm. However, such a difference is not unexpected with combination treatments compared with monotherapy.
  • Yondelis’ summary of product characteristics will be amended to include these study results.

Yondelis is used with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to treat ovarian cancer that has relapsed (come back after previous treatment) and is sensitive to medicines containing platinum.

Yondelis is also used to treat adults with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. It is used when the cancer had started to spread and treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide (other cancer medicines) have stopped working, or in patients who cannot be given these medicines.

More information about Yondelis is available.

The review of Yondelis was initiated at the request of the European Commission, under Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004.

The review has been carried out by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), responsible for questions concerning medicines for human use, which has adopted the Agency’s opinion. The CHMP opinion was forwarded to the European Commission, which issued a final legally binding decision applicable in all EU Member States on 24 September 2020.

български (BG) (142.42 KB - PDF)

View

español (ES) (117.73 KB - PDF)

View

čeština (CS) (129.32 KB - PDF)

View

dansk (DA) (125.48 KB - PDF)

View

Deutsch (DE) (120.2 KB - PDF)

View

eesti keel (ET) (123.24 KB - PDF)

View

ελληνικά (EL) (144.69 KB - PDF)

View

français (FR) (118.19 KB - PDF)

View

hrvatski (HR) (131.99 KB - PDF)

View

italiano (IT) (116.69 KB - PDF)

View

latviešu valoda (LV) (98.29 KB - PDF)

View

lietuvių kalba (LT) (136.8 KB - PDF)

View

magyar (HU) (126.75 KB - PDF)

View

Malti (MT) (134.88 KB - PDF)

View

Nederlands (NL) (118.07 KB - PDF)

View

polski (PL) (129.77 KB - PDF)

View

português (PT) (123.98 KB - PDF)

View

română (RO) (127.64 KB - PDF)

View

slovenčina (SK) (134.17 KB - PDF)

View

slovenščina (SL) (124.49 KB - PDF)

View

Suomi (FI) (116.07 KB - PDF)

View

svenska (SV) (116.6 KB - PDF)

View

Key facts

About this medicine

Approved name
Yondelis
International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name
trabectedin
Associated names
Yondelis
Class
Antineoplastic agents

About this procedure

Current status
European Commission final decision
Reference number
EMEA/H/A-20/1493/C/0773/0060
Type
Article 20 procedures

This type of procedure is triggered for medicines that have been authorised via the centralised procedure in case of quality, safety or efficacy issues.

Authorisation model
Centrally authorised product(s)

Key dates and outcomes

CHMP opinion date
24/07/2020
EC decision date
24/09/2020

All documents

Procedure started

Under evaluation

European Commission final decision

български (BG) (172.84 KB - PDF)

View

español (ES) (92.21 KB - PDF)

View

čeština (CS) (156.94 KB - PDF)

View

dansk (DA) (86.38 KB - PDF)

View

Deutsch (DE) (87.47 KB - PDF)

View

eesti keel (ET) (57.78 KB - PDF)

View

ελληνικά (EL) (171.8 KB - PDF)

View

français (FR) (92.78 KB - PDF)

View

hrvatski (HR) (148.81 KB - PDF)

View

italiano (IT) (86.54 KB - PDF)

View

latviešu valoda (LV) (155.04 KB - PDF)

View

lietuvių kalba (LT) (155.18 KB - PDF)

View

magyar (HU) (120.88 KB - PDF)

View

Malti (MT) (164.39 KB - PDF)

View

Nederlands (NL) (92.23 KB - PDF)

View

polski (PL) (123.82 KB - PDF)

View

português (PT) (95.9 KB - PDF)

View

română (RO) (152.45 KB - PDF)

View

slovenčina (SK) (116.84 KB - PDF)

View

slovenščina (SL) (144.21 KB - PDF)

View

Suomi (FI) (87.76 KB - PDF)

View

svenska (SV) (92.54 KB - PDF)

View

български (BG) (142.42 KB - PDF)

View

español (ES) (117.73 KB - PDF)

View

čeština (CS) (129.32 KB - PDF)

View

dansk (DA) (125.48 KB - PDF)

View

Deutsch (DE) (120.2 KB - PDF)

View

eesti keel (ET) (123.24 KB - PDF)

View

ελληνικά (EL) (144.69 KB - PDF)

View

français (FR) (118.19 KB - PDF)

View

hrvatski (HR) (131.99 KB - PDF)

View

italiano (IT) (116.69 KB - PDF)

View

latviešu valoda (LV) (98.29 KB - PDF)

View

lietuvių kalba (LT) (136.8 KB - PDF)

View

magyar (HU) (126.75 KB - PDF)

View

Malti (MT) (134.88 KB - PDF)

View

Nederlands (NL) (118.07 KB - PDF)

View

polski (PL) (129.77 KB - PDF)

View

português (PT) (123.98 KB - PDF)

View

română (RO) (127.64 KB - PDF)

View

slovenčina (SK) (134.17 KB - PDF)

View

slovenščina (SL) (124.49 KB - PDF)

View

Suomi (FI) (116.07 KB - PDF)

View

svenska (SV) (116.6 KB - PDF)

View

Description of documents published

Please note that some of the listed documents apply only to certain procedures.

  • Overview - lay-language summary of the stage of the procedure
  • Notification – a letter from a Member State, the European Commission or the marketing authorisation holder requesting the initiation of the procedure
  • Scientific background – further background information from the triggering Member State on the issues leading to the initiation of the procedure (if applicable)
  • List of questions – questions agreed by the Committee requesting further information from the marketing authorisation holder(s) / applicant(s) to evaluate the issues identified
  • Timetable for the procedure – agreed timeframe to respond to the list of questions, to assess the issues and to adopt a conclusion
  • List of medicines concerned by the procedure – medicine(s) / active substance(s) concerned, and marketing authorisation holder(s) / applicant(s)
  • List of questions to be addressed by the stakeholders – call for data to be submitted by stakeholders (e.g. healthcare professionals, patient organisations, individual patients) (if applicable)
  • Stakeholder submission form – form to be used by stakeholders to submit data (if applicable)
  • Scientific conclusions – scientific conclusions of the PRAC and/or CHMP and/or CMDh
  • Assessment report – PRAC or CHMP assessment and conclusions on the issues investigated, including divergent positions (if applicable)
  • Divergent positions – divergent positions of the CHMP or CMDh members for pharmacovigilance procedures (if applicable)
  • Changes to the summary of product characteristics, labelling and package leaflet (amended sections or fully revised version) (if applicable)
  • Condition(s) to the marketing authorisation(s) – condition(s) for the safe and effective use of the medicine(s) (if applicable)
  • Condition for lifting the suspension – condition to be fulfilled for the suspension of the marketing authorisation(s) to be lifted (if applicable)
  • Timetable for implementation of CMDh position – agreed timeframe to submit and finalise the variation(s) implementing the outcome of the procedure (if applicable)

Note that older documents may have different titles.

Topics

Share this page