The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the European medicines regulatory network are working to establish a sustainable framework enabling better integration of real-world data and real-world evidence into regulatory decisions. 

Darwin EU

EMA has established a coordination centre to provide timely and reliable evidence on the use, safety and effectiveness of human medicines, including vaccines, from real-world healthcare databases across the European Union (EU).

This capability is called the Data Analysis and Real World Interrogation Network (Darwin EU)

For more information, see:

HMA-EMA catalogues of real-world data sources and studies

Two online catalogues are available from HMA and EMA, one for real-world data sources and one for real-world data studies:

The catalogues serve to:

  • help regulators, researchers and pharmaceutical companies identify the most suitable data sources to address specific research questions;
  • support the assessment of study protocols and results;
  • promote transparency;
  • encourage the use of good practices;
  • build trust in research based on real-world data. 

They enhance and replace two databases previously maintained by EMA:

CatalogueDiscontinued database 
Real-word data sources European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP) catalogue
Real-world data studiesEuropean Union electronic register of post-authorisation studies (EU PAS Register)

The catalogues use an agreed list of metadata to describe and connect data sources to studies, using ‘FAIR’ (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. 

The HMA-EMA Big Data Steering Group reviews the list of metadata annually, based on feedback from catalogue users. 

A draft good practice guide is also available to help users of the catalogues.

By end of 2024, EMA intends to publish a revised version addressing feedback from a public consultation. Separate sections will cover how to use the catalogues to identify and assess the suitability of data sources, and definitions and descriptions of the metadata list. 

All European data holders, marketing authorisation holders, networks, researchers and institutions interested in having their data used for medicines regulation, or mandated by policy on non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies (PASS), are encouraged to use these catalogues.

Use of real-world evidence

A guide is available on how EMA can help generate real-world evidence.

It is meant for EU regulators and decision-makers, including EMA's scientific committees, working parties and groups, as well as national competent authorities, healthcare technology assessment bodies and payers.

It covers:

  • how the mentioned stakeholders can request real-world data studies from EMA;
  • what types of studies can be performed;
  • how EMA can help identify resources to address research questions.

EMA cannot consider requests from other bodies and institutions, including academia, pharmaceutical companies and contract research organisations.

The guidance builds on EMA's experience in using real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making, described in the report below.

Key findings include:

  • Real-world evidence can support decision-making in various regulatory contexts
  • Regulators need access to additional data sources such as secondary care databases, claims databases and registries from across Europe
  • Research needs should be identified as early as possible so that studies can be conducted in time for regulatory decisions
  • More information on data source characteristics is needed to facilitate the interpretation of real-world evidence derived from these sources
  • There is a need to build more capability and capacity for real-world evidence generation

For more information, see:

Guidance on conduct of non-interventional studies

Reflection paper on non-interventional studies

A reflection paper on non-interventional studies that use real-world data in order to generate real-world evidence for regulatory purposes is available for public consultation.

It is aimed at all stakeholders involved in the planning, conduct and analysis of this type of non-interventional studies, including marketing authorisation holders and applicants.

A non-interventional study is a clinical study that does not meet any of the conditions defining a clinical trial in Article 2.2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.

The public consultation runs from 3 May to 31 August 2024.

You can contribute by completing the survey below:

For more information on this draft reflection paper, see: 

Guideline on registry-based studies

Guidance is available on the methodological, regulatory and operational aspects involved in using registry-based studies to support regulatory decision-making: 

International collaboration on real-world evidence

EMA works to help integrate real-world evidence into regulatory decision-making across the world, within the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA).

In June 2022, ICMRA held a workshop enabling regulators to share experience in obtaining and using real-world evidence for the assessment of medicines. In July 2022, it also issued a pledge to foster global efforts in this area. 

For more information, see:

A reflection paper is available aiming to harmonise real-world evidence terminology and optimise the use of real-world data to support regulatory decision-making.

For more information, see: 

Share this page